CSSB issued final CSDS 1 and CSDS 2 on 18 December 2024, aligned with IFRS S1 and S2 with extra transition reliefs. Standards are voluntary. The CSA paused its mandatory climate disclosure rulemaking on 23 April 2025.
- Enforcement
- Voluntary
- Effective date
- Annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2025 (with transition reliefs)
- Covered entities
- Any Canadian entity (voluntary). CSA paused work on mandatory rule citing global developments.
Brazil adopted Portuguese-language versions of IFRS S1 and S2 (CBPS 01 and CBPS 02) developed by the Brazilian Sustainability Pronouncements Committee, with CVM, CMN and BCB resolutions phasing in voluntary use from 2024 to 2025 and mandatory application from 2026 to 2028 depending on the entity.
- Enforcement
- Mandatory
- Effective date
- Voluntary: FY beginning on or after 1 January 2024 (ISSB) or 1 January 2025 (CBPS). Mandatory: 1 January 2026 for publicly held companies and S1/S2 financial institutions; 1 January 2028 for other financial institutions reporting consolidated statements under international standards
- Covered entities
- Publicly held companies, investment funds, securitisation companies (CVM scope), and financial institutions and other institutions authorised to operate by BCB; mandatory application sequenced by prudential segment (S1/S2 first, others by 2028)
Chile's Financial Market Commission published General Rule No. 519 in October 2024 requiring CMF-regulated entities to apply IFRS S1 and S2 from reporting periods starting in 2026, replacing the existing TCFD and SASB-based regime under Rule 461.
- Enforcement
- Mandatory
- Effective date
- Annual reporting periods beginning in 2026, first reported in 2027 (CMF General Rule No. 519). TCFD/SASB disclosures under Rule 461 currently apply, with effective dates from 2022 to 2025 depending on size and sector
- Covered entities
- All listed entities supervised by CMF and non-listed publicly accountable entities under CMF supervision, except entities with consolidated assets at or below 1 million Chilean Units of Account (about USD 40 million) and certain financial market infrastructure firms
Mexico's CNBV amended the Circular Unica de Emisoras in January 2025 to require non-financial securities issuers to disclose IFRS S1 and S2 information, with the first reports due in 2026 for fiscal year 2025; rules for financial institutions are being developed separately.
- Enforcement
- Mandatory
- Effective date
- CUE modifications took effect 29 January 2025; first sustainability-related disclosures due in 2026 for the 2025 fiscal year
- Covered entities
- Issuers of equity, debt and other securities supervised by CNBV, excluding listed financial institutions, states and municipalities. Non-financial entities currently in scope represented around 86% of the main equity index market capitalisation at the end of Q1 2025
In April 2024, Bolivia's CTNAC approved Resolution 01/2024 adopting all current and future ISSB Standards for entities operating in Bolivia, effective for fiscal years starting on or after 1 January 2027 and pending legal endorsement by AEMP.
- Enforcement
- Voluntary or under development
- Effective date
- Resolution CTNAC 01/2024 set to take effect for fiscal years starting on or after 1 January 2027; early voluntary application is permitted
- Covered entities
- To be determined pending regulatory approval; CTNAC Resolution 01/2024 contemplates application by all entities that carry out economic activities throughout Bolivia
In January 2024 the Institute of Public Accountants of Costa Rica adopted IFRS S1 and S2 through Circular 33 (amended January 2025), with voluntary application from 2024 and mandatory application from 2027 for CONASSIF-supervised entities and large taxpayers.
- Enforcement
- Voluntary or under development
- Effective date
- Voluntary: fiscal years beginning on or after 1 January 2024. Mandatory: fiscal years beginning on or after 1 January 2027, first reported in 2028
- Covered entities
- Mandatory application limited to publicly accountable entities supervised by CONASSIF (covering SUGEVAL, SUGEF, SUPEN and SUGESE) and entities classified as 'large taxpayers' by the tax authority. Other entities applying IFRS Accounting Standards may apply voluntarily; IFRS for SMEs reporters and government entities supervised by the National Accounting Authority are excluded
In August 2024 El Salvador's Supervisory Board for Public Accounting (CVPCPA) issued Resolution 82 permitting voluntary application of IFRS S1 and S2 from 1 January 2025, with mandatory rules for publicly accountable entities pending from the Central Reserve Bank.
- Enforcement
- Voluntary or under development
- Effective date
- Voluntary application permitted from 1 January 2025; mandatory effective date not yet specified
- Covered entities
- Resolution 82 applies to non-publicly accountable entities preparing financial statements under IFRS Accounting Standards or other generally accepted principles; IFRS for SMEs reporters are excluded. Rules for publicly accountable entities are pending from the Central Reserve Bank (BCR)
California law requiring large companies doing business in the state to disclose Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions on a phased schedule. CARB is finalizing implementation rules.
- Enforcement
- Mandatory
- Effective date
- First Scope 1 & 2 reports due 2026; Scope 3 from 2027
- Covered entities
- US companies doing business in California with revenue >$1bn
Primary source ↗Verified 2026-04-30 California law requiring in-scope companies to publish a biennial climate-related financial risk report aligned with the TCFD framework or an equivalent.
- Enforcement
- Mandatory
- Effective date
- First report due 1 January 2026
- Covered entities
- US companies doing business in California with revenue >$500m
Primary source ↗Verified 2026-04-30 OSFI guideline setting expectations for climate risk governance, strategy, risk management, scenario analysis, and capital and liquidity adequacy at federally regulated financial institutions. Includes financial disclosure expectations being aligned with CSSB's CSDS standards.
- Enforcement
- Mandatory for federally regulated financial institutions
- Effective date
- Fiscal year-end 2024 for D-SIBs and IAIGs headquartered in Canada. Fiscal year-end 2025 for all other in-scope FRFIs.
- Covered entities
- All federally regulated financial institutions (FRFIs)
Primary source ↗Verified 2026-04-30 New York legislation modeled on California SB 253 requiring large companies doing business in the state to disclose Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions on a phased schedule with independent verification. Passed the NY Senate in February 2026 and is before the Assembly.
- Enforcement
- Mandatory if enacted
- Effective date
- If enacted: regulations by 31 December 2026; Scope 1+2 reporting from 2027; Scope 3 from 2028
- Covered entities
- US public and private companies with annual revenues >$1bn doing business in New York
Primary source ↗Verified 2026-04-30 The Green Guides set out how the FTC will interpret Section 5 of the FTC Act when reviewing environmental marketing claims, covering general principles such as substantiation and qualification, plus specific claim types including recyclable, compostable, degradable, carbon offsets and renewable energy. Marketers who do not follow the Guides risk deception findings.
- Enforcement
- Guidance (interpreting Section 5 of the FTC Act)
- Effective date
- Current text issued October 2012; revision date TBD
- Covered entities
- Any marketer making environmental claims about a product, package or service in US commerce
Primary source ↗Verified 2026-04-30 The amendments add two new deceptive marketing provisions targeting environmental claims: product-level claims about benefits for protecting or restoring the environment must be backed by adequate and proper testing, and business-level claims about environmental performance must be based on adequate and proper substantiation in line with internationally recognised methodology. Penalties reach the greater of CAD 10 million for a first offence or 3 percent of worldwide gross revenues.
- Enforcement
- Mandatory
- Effective date
- 20 June 2024
- Covered entities
- Any person making representations to the public in Canada about a product, business or business activity that relate to environmental or social benefits or effects
Primary source ↗Verified 2026-04-30 Importers must rebut the presumption by clear and convincing evidence that goods were not made wholly or in part with forced labour, including full supply chain tracing, due diligence, and responses to CBP requests for information. CBP detains, excludes, or seizes non-compliant shipments and publishes operational guidance and the FLETF strategy.
- Enforcement
- Mandatory
- Effective date
- 23 December 2021 (enacted); 21 June 2022 (rebuttable presumption); UFLPA Entity List updated periodically (most recent listed update in DHS records: 15 January 2025; 144 entities)
- Covered entities
- Any importer of record bringing goods into the United States. Goods mined, produced, or manufactured wholly or in part in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, or by entities on the UFLPA Entity List, are presumed to be made with forced labour and barred under 19 U.S.C. § 1307.
Primary source ↗Verified 2026-04-30 Issuers must conduct a reasonable country of origin inquiry, file an annual Form SD, and where minerals may originate in the Democratic Republic of the Congo or an adjoining country and are not from recycled or scrap sources, conduct supply chain due diligence under the OECD Guidance and file a Conflict Minerals Report. Since 2017 SEC staff has not recommended enforcement of the independent private sector audit or DRC-conflict status conclusions.
- Enforcement
- Mandatory
- Effective date
- First reports required for calendar year 2013 (Form SD filed by 31 May 2014); annual filings continue. 2017 staff guidance partially limits enforcement.
- Covered entities
- SEC-registered issuers (domestic and foreign private issuers) for which conflict minerals (tantalum, tin, tungsten, gold) are necessary to the functionality or production of a product they manufacture or contract to manufacture.
Primary source ↗Verified 2026-04-30 In-scope entities and government institutions must file an annual report to the Minister of Public Safety by 31 May describing the steps taken in the prior financial year to prevent and reduce forced labour and child labour risks in their activities and supply chains, and publish the report on their website. The Act amends the Customs Tariff to prohibit imports of goods made with forced or child labour. Offences carry fines up to CAD 250,000 and director/officer liability.
- Enforcement
- Mandatory
- Effective date
- 1 January 2024; first annual reports due by 31 May 2024 and each 31 May thereafter
- Covered entities
- Government institutions producing, purchasing, or distributing goods, plus 'entities' (corporations, trusts, partnerships, or other unincorporated organisations) that are listed on a Canadian stock exchange, or have a place of business in Canada, do business in Canada, or have assets in Canada and meet at least two of: CAD 20 million in assets, CAD 40 million in revenue, or 250 employees on average (worldwide, in at least one of the two most recent financial years), and are involved in producing, importing, or distributing goods.
Primary source ↗Verified 2026-04-30 EPR in Canada is set province by province under the CCME action plan, with British Columbia, Ontario and Quebec running the most developed full producer-funded systems for packaging, paper, electronics, batteries and other product streams. Ottawa has no overarching federal EPR statute; CEPA underpins toxic-substances rules and federal coordination, while provinces operate the schemes through PROs such as Recycle BC, Circular Materials and Éco Entreprises Québec.
- Enforcement
- Mandatory
- Effective date
- BC packaging EPR since 19 May 2014; Ontario Blue Box transitioned to full producer responsibility 1 July 2023 with full rollout by end-2025; Quebec modernised packaging EPR effective 1 January 2025; EEE, batteries, tyres and paint schemes since the 2000s
- Covered entities
- Producers (brand owners, first importers, distributors) of packaging, printed paper, EEE, batteries, tyres, paint, lamps, used oil and other regulated products in each province; thresholds vary (e.g., Ontario small-producer exemption below CAD 2 million revenue or 1 tonne supplied)
Primary source ↗Verified 2026-04-30 Mexico's LGPGIR makes manufacturers, importers and distributors of listed products draft and implement Waste Management Plans (Planes de Manejo) covering collection, return and recycling. SEMARNAT lists priority products in NOMs such as NOM-161, and several states (notably Mexico City) layer their own packaging and plastics rules on top.
- Enforcement
- Mandatory
- Effective date
- LGPGIR in force 6 January 2004; Reglamento in force 2007; NOM-161 published 1 February 2013
- Covered entities
- Producers, importers, distributors and traders of products on a national list of priority waste streams; large generators of hazardous and special-handling waste
Primary source ↗Verified 2026-04-30 Brazil's PNRS makes manufacturers, importers, distributors and retailers responsible for reverse logistics of listed products, including packaging, e-waste, batteries, tyres and lubricant containers. The 2022 decree consolidated rules, created the National Reverse Logistics Programme and tightened reporting through SINIR.
- Enforcement
- Mandatory
- Effective date
- Lei 12.305 enacted 2 August 2010, in force from 3 August 2010; Decreto 10.936 enacted 12 January 2022
- Covered entities
- Manufacturers, importers, distributors and retailers of products subject to mandatory reverse logistics, including pesticides, lubricant oils and packaging, tyres, batteries, fluorescent lamps, electrical and electronic equipment, and general packaging covered by sectoral agreements
Primary source ↗Verified 2026-04-30 Chile's Ley REP requires producers of six priority products to organise and finance collection and recycling of their post-consumer waste, individually or via a Producer Responsibility System (SCG). Decrees set rising collection and recycling targets, with the packaging decree (DS 12/2021) ramping up from 2023.
- Enforcement
- Mandatory
- Effective date
- Ley REP enacted 1 June 2016; DS 12/2021 packaging decree in force 16 March 2021 with collection targets starting September 2023; tyre obligations from January 2023
- Covered entities
- Producers (first introducer to the Chilean market) of six priority products: tyres, packaging, lubricant oils, EEE, batteries and textiles, above thresholds set in each supreme decree
Primary source ↗Verified 2026-04-30 Colombia regulates EPR product by product through ministerial resolutions, requiring producers and importers of packaging, batteries, e-waste and tyres to file Environmental Management Plans (PAPGAREE / planes posconsumo) with ANLA. The packaging resolution sets a rising recovery target reaching 30% of packaging placed on the market.
- Enforcement
- Mandatory
- Effective date
- Resolución 1407 effective 26 July 2018; battery and WEEE resolutions effective from 2010; tyre resolution effective 2017
- Covered entities
- Producers and importers of primary, secondary and tertiary packaging in paper, cardboard, plastic, glass and metal above thresholds in Resolución 1407; producers of batteries, EEE and tyres
Primary source ↗Verified 2026-04-30 Argentina does not yet have a national EPR statute for packaging, e-waste or batteries; the framework relies on Ley 25.916 plus a patchwork of provincial laws, with Buenos Aires, Santa Fe and Chaco leading on WEEE. A national RAEE bill and a separate batteries and accumulators bill have been debated in Congress for years without final approval.
- Enforcement
- Mandatory at provincial level; voluntary nationally pending federal law
- Effective date
- Ley 25.916 in force since September 2004; Buenos Aires Ley 14.321 since December 2011; national RAEE bill repeatedly tabled but not enacted as of May 2026
- Covered entities
- Producers and importers of electrical and electronic equipment, batteries and packaging in provinces with their own EPR laws; obligations vary by province
Primary source ↗Verified 2026-04-30 Peru's solid waste law sets EPR as a general principle (Articles 12 to 14) and authorises MINAM to designate priority products that producers must collect and recycle. The WEEE regulation (DS 009-2019) is the most developed product-specific scheme, with tyre, battery and packaging regulations following.
- Enforcement
- Mandatory
- Effective date
- DL 1278 published 23 December 2016; Reglamento effective 22 December 2017; RAEE regulation DS 009-2019 effective 2019
- Covered entities
- Manufacturers, importers, distributors and retailers of products defined as priority by MINAM, in particular EEE, tyres, batteries, lubricants and packaging in scope of future reglamentos
Primary source ↗Verified 2026-04-30 Uruguay applies extended producer responsibility through Ley 17.849 on non-returnable packaging and Ley 17.283's general environmental principles, with Decreto 260/007 setting up the Plan de Envases run by the Cámara de Industrias. Separate decrees cover batteries, tyres and lubricant containers.
- Enforcement
- Mandatory
- Effective date
- Ley 17.283 in force 2000; Ley 17.849 in force 2004; Decreto 260/007 in force 2007
- Covered entities
- Brand owners and importers of non-returnable packaging marketed in Uruguay; producers and importers of batteries, tyres and lubricants
Primary source ↗Verified 2026-04-30 California runs the most extensive set of state EPR laws in the US, anchored by SB 54 which makes producers of single-use packaging and plastic food service ware fund collection, recycling and source reduction through Circular Action Alliance as the state's sole PRO. Separate laws cover paint, mattresses, carpet, batteries, sharps and (under SB 707) textiles.
- Enforcement
- Mandatory
- Effective date
- SB 54 signed 30 June 2022; permanent regulations effective 1 May 2026; full recyclability and 65% recycling rate by 1 January 2032; textiles SB 707 collection by 1 January 2030
- Covered entities
- Producers of single-use packaging and plastic food service ware sold in California; paint, mattress, carpet, battery, sharps and textile producers under each product-specific stewardship law
Primary source ↗Verified 2026-04-30 Oregon's Recycling Modernization Act makes producers of packaging, food service ware and printing paper join Circular Action Alliance as the state PRO and pay fees that fund expanded curbside service, processor upgrades and contamination reduction. Paint, electronics, mattresses and batteries run under separate stewardship statutes administered by DEQ.
- Enforcement
- Mandatory
- Effective date
- SB 582 effective 1 January 2022; RMA producer obligations operational from 1 July 2025; mattress program launched 2024; paint and e-cycles since the 2010s
- Covered entities
- Producers of packaging, food service ware and paper products sold in Oregon (over 1,700 registered); paint, mattress, electronics and battery producers under separate stewardship laws
Primary source ↗Verified 2026-04-30 Washington became the seventh US state with packaging EPR when Governor Ferguson signed the Recycling Reform Act in May 2025, shifting recycling costs from local governments to producers through a Producer Responsibility Organisation. Existing stewardship programmes for electronics (E-Cycle), paint (PaintCare) and rechargeable and primary batteries continue alongside.
- Enforcement
- Mandatory
- Effective date
- SB 5284 signed 17 May 2025; producers must appoint a PRO by 1 January 2026, PRO registration by 1 March 2026, plan submitted by 1 October 2028, full implementation 1 January 2030; E-Cycle since 1 January 2009; battery program rolls out 2027
- Covered entities
- Producers of glass, plastic, paper and metal packaging and paper products sold in Washington; covered electronic device manufacturers; paint and battery producers
Primary source ↗Verified 2026-04-30 Maine was the first US state to enact packaging EPR, with LD 1541 putting full municipal recycling costs onto producers through a single Stewardship Organisation selected by Maine DEP via competitive bidding. The 2025 amendment narrowed scope to exclude certain commercial, medical and hazardous packaging.
- Enforcement
- Mandatory
- Effective date
- LD 1541 enacted 13 July 2021; LD 1423 amendments signed 20 June 2025; DEP RFP for stewardship organisation early 2026; producer registration May 2026; first reporting May 2027; first payments September 2027
- Covered entities
- Producers selling more than USD 5 million annually and using more than 15 tons of packaging in Maine; e-waste, paint and mattress producers under each stewardship law
Primary source ↗Verified 2026-04-30 Colorado's Producer Responsibility Program for Statewide Recycling Act requires producers of packaging and paper products to fund a uniform statewide recycling system through Circular Action Alliance as the designated PRO. Local governments and haulers receive reimbursement from PRO-collected dues, with the goal of raising the state recycling rate from 25% to 58% by 2035.
- Enforcement
- Mandatory
- Effective date
- HB22-1355 signed 3 June 2022; CDPHE designated Circular Action Alliance as PRO in May 2023; program plan approved December 2025; implementation begins summer 2026; full statewide free residential service required by 1 January 2030
- Covered entities
- Producers of packaging materials and paper products sold or distributed to residences, public spaces, small businesses, schools, hospitality and government buildings in Colorado, above small-producer thresholds
Primary source ↗Verified 2026-04-30 Vermont was the first US state to require producer-funded recycling of single-use batteries (Act 139), running alongside earlier producer stewardship laws for electronics (Act 79) and paint (Act 58). DEC reviews and approves stewardship plans, with Call2Recycle handling batteries and PaintCare handling paint.
- Enforcement
- Mandatory
- Effective date
- Act 79 effective 1 July 2010 (collection 2011); Act 58 paint program effective 2014; Act 139 primary batteries effective 1 January 2016
- Covered entities
- Producers of covered electronic devices, architectural paint and primary (single-use) and rechargeable batteries sold in Vermont; mercury thermostat manufacturers
Primary source ↗Verified 2026-04-30 New York runs product-by-product EPR through NYSDEC, covering electronics, rechargeable batteries, paint, mercury thermostats and pharmaceuticals, with each statute setting manufacturer registration, collection and reporting duties. A packaging EPR bill (Packaging Reduction and Recycling Infrastructure Act) has passed the Senate multiple times but is [uncertain] as of May 2026.
- Enforcement
- Mandatory
- Effective date
- Electronic Equipment Recycling and Reuse Act effective 28 May 2010 with collection from 1 April 2011; Rechargeable Battery Recycling Act signed 10 December 2010; Postconsumer Paint Collection Act effective 9 May 2022; Drug Take Back Act effective 2019
- Covered entities
- Manufacturers of covered electronic equipment, rechargeable batteries, architectural paint, mercury thermostats and prescription drugs sold in New York
Primary source ↗Verified 2026-04-30 New Jersey's main EPR statute is the Electronic Waste Management Act, which makes manufacturers fund free recycling of TVs, monitors, computers and small printers for consumers and small businesses. Newer laws extend EPR to paint (PaintCare), pharmaceuticals and EV propulsion batteries, the latter making NJ the first US state with an EV battery EPR law.
- Enforcement
- Mandatory
- Effective date
- E-Waste Act effective 1 January 2009, amended July 2016; Paint Stewardship Act effective 2021; EV Battery Act signed January 2022; Drug Take-Back effective 2018
- Covered entities
- Manufacturers of covered electronic devices, architectural paint, prescription drugs and propulsion (EV, lithium-ion, nickel-metal hydride) batteries sold in New Jersey
Primary source ↗Verified 2026-04-30 Connecticut runs one of the broadest sets of US product stewardship laws under DEEP, beginning with electronics (2007) and now covering paint, mattresses, mercury thermostats, gas cylinders, tires and batteries. The mattress program (run by Mattress Recycling Council) recycles around 200,000 mattresses a year and saves municipalities millions in disposal fees.
- Enforcement
- Mandatory
- Effective date
- Electronics EPR effective 1 January 2009; paint 2011; mattresses 2013; mercury thermostats 2014; gas cylinders 2022; tires 2023; battery stewardship enacted 2025
- Covered entities
- Manufacturers of covered electronics, paint, mattresses, mercury thermostats, propane and other gas cylinders, tires and batteries sold in Connecticut
Primary source ↗Verified 2026-04-30 Massachusetts does not yet have a comprehensive packaging EPR law; MassDEP runs disposal bans on mattresses and textiles and chairs a legislative EPR commission that in January 2026 recommended new EPR programs for paint, mattresses, batteries and electronics. Pending legislation would create a paint stewardship law as the first formal EPR program.
- Enforcement
- Mostly voluntary or disposal-ban based, pending legislation
- Effective date
- EPR Commission established 2022, final report 15 January 2026; mattress and textile disposal bans effective 1 November 2022
- Covered entities
- No statutory producer obligations yet beyond waste bans; commission recommended EPR for paint, mattresses, batteries and electronics
Primary source ↗Verified 2026-04-30 Minnesota became the fifth US state with packaging EPR when Governor Walz signed the Packaging Waste and Cost Reduction Act in May 2024, requiring producers to join a PRO by mid-2026 and ensure all packaging is reusable, recyclable, compostable or in an approved alternate stream by 2032. MPCA maintains the collection lists and oversees the program alongside existing electronics, paint and mattress stewardship laws.
- Enforcement
- Mandatory
- Effective date
- HF 3577 signed 21 May 2024; producers must join a PRO by 1 July 2026; full reusable/recyclable/compostable packaging requirement by 2032; electronics program since 2007; paint program since 2014
- Covered entities
- Producers (brand owners, packaging manufacturers or distributors) of packaging and paper sold into Minnesota; electronics, paint and mattress producers under their respective laws
Primary source ↗Verified 2026-04-30 Illinois requires electronics manufacturers to register annually with Illinois EPA and run a recycling program for residential covered devices, with a convenience standard set in the 2017 Consumer Electronics Recycling Act. Paint, mattresses and packaging are handled through voluntary or municipal channels rather than statewide EPR.
- Enforcement
- Mandatory for electronics; voluntary or pending for other streams
- Effective date
- Original e-waste law effective 1 January 2009; modernised Consumer Electronics Recycling Act signed 25 August 2017, effective 1 January 2019
- Covered entities
- Manufacturers of covered electronic devices (televisions, computers, monitors, printers and peripherals) sold to Illinois residents
Primary source ↗Verified 2026-04-30 Rhode Island bans televisions and computers from landfill and requires manufacturers to fund either their own take-back program or the state-run RI Resource Recovery Corporation scheme. Paint producers fund PaintCare drop-offs under the 2012 stewardship law administered by DEM.
- Enforcement
- Mandatory
- Effective date
- E-waste act effective 1 January 2009 with landfill ban from 2009; paint stewardship effective 1 July 2014
- Covered entities
- Manufacturers of covered electronic devices and architectural paint sold in Rhode Island; mercury thermostat producers
Primary source ↗Verified 2026-04-30